Climate change presents threatening challenges to the built environment. Global warming is making traditional design practice inadequate. For example, in mild climates, as building design follows an overall passive solar heating strategy complemented with night ventilation, most studies focused on reducing the heating losses during winter. Therefore, highly insulated envelopes were proposed in Madrid, Milan and Lisbon as climate mitigation measures. These results were expected, as buildings in these regions are known for their low indoor air quality due to being poorly built. Thus, the benefits of high insulation levels were expected.
However, these studies implicitly assume that occupants will just adapt to the future climate without resorting to cooling-based air-conditioning systems. However, this assumption is questioned by recent studies that argue that occupants will purchase those systems, thus shifting from today's winter heating paradigm towards cooling-based needs. As future climate scenarios indicate longer hours of solar availability, the electricity consumed by cooling systems may be compensated using photovoltaic and thermal collector systems. However, these systems' implementation viability depends strongly on surroundings, building shape, and available installation surface area.
It is, therefore, essential to analyze the building's performance holistically and on an annual basis. Whenever incorporated in the analysis, studies show that cooling needs are a significant part of the total energy consumed. Thus, highly insulated buildings will increase overheating, which was estimated for several countries. For example, retirement villages in the UK, designed to meet the net-zero energy target, expose the elderly to grave health risks from overheating. In Cyprus, the country's annual electricity demand will rise by 6 %. In Switzerland, apartment buildings' cooling demand will increase to 244 %. Similar concerns on overheating were also found in Belgium.
|